A before-and-after evaluation of a self-guided learning package

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and objective In Australia, over a third of individuals living with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remain undiagnosed. Evidence suggests general practitioners (GPs) can be uncertain regarding whom to test. The aim of this study was to evaluate an educational resource for improving GPs’ knowledge about whom to test for CHB. Methods Following a 2014 baseline survey that identified gaps in CHB knowledge among GPs in Victoria, an educational resource package was developed. Using a follow-up survey, the resource was evaluated by comparing the before-and-after CHB-related knowledge. Results Sixty-five GPs responded to both the baseline and follow-up survey. Their knowledge of populations at high risk of CHB who require testing was significantly greater following the intervention than at baseline. Discussion Concise, clear and practical resources can support GPs when identifying whom to test for hepatitis B.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xiao, Y., Gemert, C. van, Howell, J., Adamson, E., Towell, V., Cowie, B. C., … Hellard, M. (2020). A before-and-after evaluation of a self-guided learning package. Australian Journal of General Practice, 49(1–2), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-10-18-4739

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free