Constitutive Instrumentalism and the Fragility of Responsibility

17Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Constitutive instrumentalism is the view that responsibility practices arise from and are justified by our being prosocial creatures who need responsibility practices to secure specific kinds of social goods. In particular, responsibility practices shape agency in ways that disposes adherence to norms that enable goods of shared cooperative life. The mechanics of everyday responsibility practices operate, in part, via costly signaling about the suitability of agents for coordination and cooperation under conditions of shared cooperative life. So, there are a range of identifiable conditions where the ordinary operation of responsibility practices—and thus, the usual normative force of the practices—is disrupted. Even so, these conditions are not so widespread as to favor a more thoroughgoing abandonment of responsibility practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vargas, M. (2021). Constitutive Instrumentalism and the Fragility of Responsibility. Monist, 104(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onab010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free