Is small for gestational age status independently correlated with body composition during childhood?

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to examine if small for gestation age (SGA) status is correlated with alterations in body composition at prepuberty, independently of other factors, comparing SGA-born children with appropriate for gestational age (AGA)-born children. We examined anthropometrics, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), six skinfold thickness, and body composition using the method of bioelectrical impedance in 636 children aged 7 to 10 years. We also considered age, gender, birth mode, mother’s age, prepregnancy weight, weight gain during pregnancy, social status, parental BMI, type of feeding, and daily exercise. We examined 636 children at a mean age of 9 years: 106 SGA-born and 530 AGA-born children. SGA as compared to AGA-born children had a lower BMI z-score (0.26 ± 0.89 kg/cm2 vs 0.46 ± 0.84 kg/cm2, p < 0.050) and a lower lean mass, although that was not statistically significant (24.0 ± 6.6 kg vs 25.6 ± 6.4 kg, p < 0.100). SGA-born children presented no difference in waist circumference or fat mass in comparison to children born AGA. Logistic regression analysis revealed a strong independent negative association between SGA status and BMI (beta = − 2.33, OR = 0.70 p = 0.019) and SGA status and lean mass (beta = − 2.43, OR = 0.95 p = 0.010). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that SGA-born children had a lower BMI as compared to AGA-born subjects, whereas SGA status was negatively associated with BMI and lean mass.What is Known:• Deviant birth weight for gestation has been associated with an increased risk of childhood adiposity.• Evidence remains scarce on whether small for gestational age status affects body composition and obesity later in childhood.What is New:• Among school-aged children, small for gestational age subjects had a lower body mass index as compared to appropriate for gestational age counterparts, whereas small for gestational age status was negatively associated with body mass index and lean mass.• A meticulous observation is needed during childhood in children born with deviant birth weight.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balomenou, F., Rallis, D., Evangelou, F., Zisi, A., Balomenou, K., Tsekas, N., … Giapros, V. (2023). Is small for gestational age status independently correlated with body composition during childhood? European Journal of Pediatrics, 182(2), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04723-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free