The precautionary principle at work: The case of neonicotinoids and the health of bees

7Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In recent years, scientists have noted a decline in the health of bee populations. Whereas a whole host of possible causes have been identified, it is the use of pesticides in agriculture—specifically the use of neonicotinoids—that has warranted some investigation. The scientific evidence of their impact on the health of bees remains debated. This article examines how the UK Government has responded to the decline in bee populations and the apparent link to neonicotinoids. While notionally committed to deploying the Precautionary Principle in such instances, the government has tended to err more on ‘sound science’ as a policymaking tool. Early evidence indicates that the government used the latter initially but has become more amenable to utilising a precautionary approach recently. Whether this can be attributed to an embrace of the Precautionary Principle, or simply a change caused by the installation of a new Secretary of State for the Environment, is open to interpretation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patterson, A., & McLean, C. (2019). The precautionary principle at work: The case of neonicotinoids and the health of bees. Science and Public Policy, 46(3), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free