Team reasoning — Experimental evidence on cooperation from centipede games

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous laboratory studies on the centipede game have found that subjects exhibit surprisingly high levels of cooperation. Across disciplines, it has recently been highlighted that these high levels of cooperation might be explained by “team reasoning”, the willingness to think as a team rather than as an individual. We run an experiment with a standard centipede game as a baseline. In two treatments, we seek to induce team reasoning by making a joint goal salient. First, we implement a probabilistic variant of the centipede game that makes it easy to identify a joint goal. Second, we frame the game as a situation where a team of two soccer players attempts to score a goal. This frame increases the salience even more. Compared to the baseline, our treatments induce higher levels of cooperation. In a second experiment, we obtain similar evidence in a more natural environment–a beer garden during the 2014 FIFA Soccer World Cup. Our study contributes to understanding how a salient goal can support cooperation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lambsdorff, J. G., Giamattei, M., Werner, K., & Schubert, M. (2018). Team reasoning — Experimental evidence on cooperation from centipede games. PLoS ONE, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206666

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free