Impact of the distance from the stent edge to the residual plaque on edge restenosis following everolimus-eluting stent implantation

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the relation between stent edge restenosis (SER) and the distance from the stent edge to the residual plaque using quantitative intravascular ultrasound. Background: Although percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents has improved SER rates, determining an appropriate stent edge landing zone can be challenging in cases of diffuse plaque lesions. It is known that edge vascular response can occur within 2 mm from the edge of a bare metal stent, but the distance to the adjacent plaque has not been evaluated for drug-eluting stents. Methods: A total of 97 proximal residual plaque lesions (plaque burden [PB] >40%) treated with everolimuseluting stents were retrospectively evaluated to determine the distance from the stent edge to the residual plaque. Results: The SER group had significantly higher PB (59.1 ± 6.1% vs. 51.9 ± 9.1% for non-SER; P = 0.04). Higher PB was associated with SER, with the cutoff value of 54.74% determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. At this cutoff value of PB, the distance from the stent edge to the lesion was significantly associated with SER (odds ratio = 2.05, P = 0.035). The corresponding area under the ROC curve was 0.725, and the cutoff distance value for predicting SER was 1.0 mm. Conclusion: An interval less than 1 mm from the proximal stent edge to the nearest point with the determined PB cutoff value of 54.74% was significantly associated with SER in patients with residual plaque lesions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takahashi, M., Miyazaki, S., Myojo, M., Sawaki, D., Iwata, H., Kiyosue, A., … Komuro, I. (2015). Impact of the distance from the stent edge to the residual plaque on edge restenosis following everolimus-eluting stent implantation. PLoS ONE, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121079

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free