Flavor, Tenderness, and Related Chemical Changes of Aged Beef Strip Loins

27Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Varying aging times and methods were evaluated for their effect on flavor, tenderness, and related changes in volatile compounds and flavor precursors. Strip loin sections from USDA Choice beef carcasses (n = 38) were randomly assigned to treatments: (1) 3 d wet-aged, (2) 14 d wet-aged, (3) 28 d wet-aged, (4) 35 d wet-aged, (5) 49 d wet-aged, (6) 63 d wet-aged, (7) 21 d dry-aged, and (8) 14 d wet-aged followed by 21 d dry-aged. Samples were analyzed for trained sensory attributes, shear force, volatile compounds, and flavor precursors (fatty acids, free amino acids, and sugars). Discriminant function analysis was used to identify sensory attributes contributing the greatest to treatment differences. Flavor notes were not differentiated in beef aged up to 35 d, regardless of aging method. A shift in flavor occurred between 35 d and 49 d of wet-aging time that was characterized by more intense sour and musty/earthy notes. Both shear force assessment and trained panelists agreed that tenderness was not affected (P > 0.05) by additional aging beyond 28 d. Volatile compound production and liberation of amino acids and sugars increased (P < 0.01) during the progression of aging time, with no change (P > 0.05) in fatty acid composition, which may be a result of metabolic processes like microbial metabolism. Chemical properties shared strong positive relationships (r > 0.50, P < 0.001) with sour, musty/earthy, and overall tenderness. These results substantiate the deteriorative effect of extended aging times of 49 d or greater on flavor of beef strip loins without tenderness improvement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foraker, B. A., Gredell, D. A., Legako, J. F., Stevens, R. D., Tatum, J. D., Belk, K. E., & Woerner, D. R. (2020). Flavor, Tenderness, and Related Chemical Changes of Aged Beef Strip Loins. Meat and Muscle Biology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.11115

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free