An Individual-Differences Framework for Comparing Nonnative With Native Speakers: Perspectives From BLC Theory

54Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article proposes basic (shared) and extended (nonshared) language cognition in native speakers as a function of two types of extralinguistic attributes: (a) degree of being multilingual and (b) variables related to amount and type of literacy experiences (e.g., level of education). This approach may throw new light on the question of whether bilinguals can attain complete or native proficiency in two (or more) languages and the question of whether both early and late second language (L2) learners can attain native levels of L2 proficiency. An adequate language acquisition theory should explain why some structures are and some other structures are not comprehended and produced by all native speakers and also describe the acquisition over time (development) of lexical-grammatical structures comprehended or produced by all native speakers or only by some. It is argued that usage-based linguistics stands a better chance of accomplishing this task than generative linguistics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hulstijn, J. H. (2019). An Individual-Differences Framework for Comparing Nonnative With Native Speakers: Perspectives From BLC Theory. Language Learning, 69, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12317

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free