Quantitative MRI analysis of menisci using biexponential T 2* fitting with a variable echo time sequence

42Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose The goal of this study was to differentiate between normal, degenerative meniscus, and meniscal tears using monoexponentially and biexponentially calculated T2*. Meniscal disease, characterized by an altered collagen fiber matrix, might be detectable in vivo using quantitative T2* mapping. Methods A 3D Cartesian spoiled gradient echo technique was adapted to enable the use of a variable echo time approach in combination with a highly asymmetric readout. T2* was calculated monoexponentially and biexponentially using three- and five-parametric non-linear fits, respectively. Results From a total of 68 evaluated menisci, 48 were normal, 12 were degenerated, and eight had tears. Mean values for the short (T2*s) and long (T 2*l) T2* components were as follows: in normal menisci, 0.82 ± 0.38/15.0 ± 5.4 ms, respectively; in degenerated menisci, 1.29 ± 0.53/19.97 ± 5.59 ms, respectively; and, in meniscal tears, 2.05 ± 0.73 and 26.83 ± 7.72 ms, respectively. Biexponentially fitted T2* demonstrated a greater ability to distinguish normal and degenerated menisci using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (higher area under curve as well as higher specificity and sensitivity). Conclusion This study suggests that biexponential fitting, used for T2* calculation in the menisci, provides better results compared to monoexponential fitting. Observed changes in T2* result from the matrix reorganization in degenerative processes in the menisci, which affects the collagen fiber orientation, as well as content. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Juras, V., Apprich, S., Zbýň, Š., Zak, L., Deligianni, X., Szomolanyi, P., … Trattnig, S. (2014). Quantitative MRI analysis of menisci using biexponential T 2* fitting with a variable echo time sequence. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 71(3), 1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free