Erratum: Using energy requirements to compare the suitability of alternative methods for broadcast and site-specific weed control (Weed Technology (2019) 33 (663-650) DOI: 10.1017/wet.2019.32)

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the original publication of Coleman (2019), the reported tillage parameters and implement definition for the rotary hoe were based on a power take off (PTO)-driven cultivator; however, the presented energy consumption calculations were for the ground-driven implement. The name rotary hoe is used for two significantly different implements: i) a PTO-driven cultivator commonly used in the UK and Australia for aggressive soil disturbance with slow work rates, and ii) a ground-driven implement used for shallow cultivation in the US with high work rates. (Figure Presented). (Table Presented). fast movement over large fields, with the ground-driven wheels typically measuring 45 to 53 cm in diameter. The authors apologize for this error.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coleman, G. R. Y., Stead, A., Rigter, M. P., Xu, Z., Johnson, D., Brooker, G. M., … Walsh, M. J. (2020). Erratum: Using energy requirements to compare the suitability of alternative methods for broadcast and site-specific weed control (Weed Technology (2019) 33 (663-650) DOI: 10.1017/wet.2019.32). Weed Technology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.131

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free