Background There is a growing body of evidence that safe outcomes and quality care are important to patients. For the patient, evaluations of safety and quality are made on the basis of the interpersonal interactions that they have with health professionals as well as the technical aspects of their care. Objective In this study, we investigated the extent to which outcome of care (harm or not) and relationship (good or bad) with the care provider impact on the judgements of responsibility and blame as well as decisions about likelihood of making a complaint. Method Ninety-eight mothers made seven ratings of responsibility, blame and action in response to four hypothetical vignettes in a questionnaire. The vignettes described poor quality ante-natal care in which outcome and relationship with the health-care provider were systematically manipulated across different versions of the questionnaire. Results Multivariate analyses showed that participants made significantly more negative ratings in response to vignettes describing a bad outcome and those that described a poor relationship with the health professional. However, whilst ratings of seriousness and likelihood of making a complaint were most influenced by the manipulation of outcome in the vignettes, judgements of blame and responsibility were most effected by the depiction of relationship with the health professional as good or bad. Moreover, for three of the four vignettes, relationship rather than outcome most strongly influenced overall ratings of care. Discussion These findings are discussed in the context of theory and policy developments. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
CITATION STYLE
Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Plachcinski, R. (2011). Using vignettes to explore judgements of patients about safety and quality of care: The role of outcome and relationship with the care provider. Health Expectations, 14(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00622.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.