The Classification of Q1 SJR-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by an AI-driven "suspected Predatory" Journal Classifier

10Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In academic publishing, there is a need to be able to discern scholarly from unscholarly, deceptive, and/or predatory journals. Predatory journals are not expected among highly ranked journals in reputable databases. SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which ranks journals into four quartiles (Q1-Q4), acts as a whitelist or safelist for journal selection. Q1 SJR-ranked journals are likely not "predatory."An artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool Academic Journal Predatory Checking (AJPC) system launched in February 2023 claims to differentiate suspected predatory journals (SPJs) from normal journals. AJPC system classified, in a 2 June 2023 assessment, 27 (or 42%) of the 64 Q1 SJR-ranked library and information science journals, most (48%) published by Taylor & Francis, as SPJs. This output is unlikely to be accurate (or is likely to be inaccurate) and may suggest that this free online AI-driven tool, whose output can be independently verified by anybody, may be providing erroneous output, and thus misleading information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Da Silva, J. A. T. (2023). The Classification of Q1 SJR-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by an AI-driven “suspected Predatory” Journal Classifier. Open Information Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0150

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free