External Fixation Versus Open Reduction With Locked Volar Plating for Geriatric Distal Radius Fractures

5Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The optimal management of displaced dorsal radius fractures (DRFs) in older patients remains an issue of debate. Bridging external fixation is a well-accepted treatment modality for severely comminuted DRFs, while open reduction and internal fixation with locked volar plating has emerged as a promising alternative in recent years. The current body of randomized trials supports the trend toward locked volar plating, as it allows for quicker improvement in subjective and functional outcomes. There is no clear evidence to suggest that one technique carries significantly less complications than the other. Locked volar plating should be considered in patients for whom an accelerated functional recovery would be advantageous. Otherwise, both external fixation and locked volar plating provide good long-term clinical outcomes. © 2014, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, D. J., & Elfar, J. C. (2014). External Fixation Versus Open Reduction With Locked Volar Plating for Geriatric Distal Radius Fractures. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, 5(3), 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458514542337

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free