Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: A Review of Treatment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a collection of symptoms that neonates may experience following antenatal exposure to substances that induce withdrawal. Optimal management remains unknown, and there is variation in management and outcomes. Objectives: To describe the management, length of hospitalization, and adverse events in near-term and full-term neonates with NAS for whom treatment (pharmacotherapy and/or supportive care) was initiated in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Methods: A chart review was conducted of neonates admitted to the NICU of Surrey Memorial Hospital, Surrey, British Columbia, who received treatment for NAS between September 1, 2016, and September 1, 2021. Results: A total of 48 neonates met the inclusion criteria. Opioids represented the most frequent type of antenatal exposure. Polysubstance exposures occurred in 45 (94%) of the neonates. Morphine was given to 29 (60%) of the neonates, and phenobarbital to 6 (13%); 5 of these neonates received both medications. The average duration of morphine treatment was 14 days, and the average length of hospitalization (all patients) was 16 days. All of the neonates experienced adverse events; in particular, 9 (30%) of the 30 who received pharmacotherapy were too sedated to feed, compared with 0% of the 18 with no pharmacotherapy. Conclusions: The common finding of polysubstance antenatal exposure, involving predominantly opioids, was associated with scheduled morphine pharmacotherapy for the majority of patients, prolonged hospitalization, and frequent adverse events. Pharmacotherapy for NAS was associated with levels of sedation that interfered with feeding in neonates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kain, S., & Newby, B. (2023). Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: A Review of Treatment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 76(3), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free