Adjuvant therapy versus watch-and-wait post surgery for stage III melanoma: A multicountry retrospective chart review

11Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To describe treatment patterns among patients with stage III melanoma who underwent surgical excision in years 2011-2016, and assess outcomes among patients who subsequently received systemic adjuvant therapy versus watch-and-wait. Methods: Chart review of 380 patients from 17 melanoma centers in North America, South America and Europe. Results: Of 129 (34%) patients treated with adjuvant therapy, 85% received interferon α-2b and 56% discontinued treatment (mostly due to adverse events). Relapse-free survival was significantly longer for patients treated with adjuvant therapy versus watch-and-wait (hazard ratio = 0.63; p < 0.05). There was considerable heterogeneity in adjuvant treatment schedules and doses. Similar results were found in patients who received interferon-based adjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Adjuvant therapies with better safety/efficacy profiles will improve clinical outcomes in patients with stage III melanoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohr, P., Kiecker, F., Soriano, V., Dereure, O., Mujika, K., Saiag, P., … Zager, J. S. (2019). Adjuvant therapy versus watch-and-wait post surgery for stage III melanoma: A multicountry retrospective chart review. Melanoma Management, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2019-0015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free