An assessment of wildlife road casualties - The potential discrepancy between numbers counted and numbers killed

156Citations
Citations of this article
253Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

By artificially baiting roads, it is shown that simple counts of wildlife corpses found on roads are severe underestimate of the actual road casualty rate. The death rate can be 12-16 times that observed by simply counting corpses particularly from a moving vehicle. Removal rates depend on a range of factors including of species of predator, species of prey, type and topography of road, road traffic, season, time of day and weather conditions. It is suggested that a greater importance should be afforded, than has previously been the case to the "gross" casualty rate rather than accept the "net" number of casualties as an indicator of loss.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slater, F. M. (2002). An assessment of wildlife road casualties - The potential discrepancy between numbers counted and numbers killed. Web Ecology, 3, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-3-33-2002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free