Degradation and fermentation of α‐gluco‐oligosaccharides by bacterial strains from human colon: in vitro and in vivo studies in gnotobiotic rats

95Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The ability of several human gut bacteria to break down α‐1,2 and α‐1,6 glycosidic linkages in α‐gluco‐oligosaccharides (GOS) was investigated in vitro in substrate utilization tests. Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Bifidobacterium breve and Clostridium butyricum, which are usually found in the infant gut and have been associated with both beneficial and deleterious effects on health, were studied. α‐Gluco‐oligosaccharide degradation was compared in vitro and in vivo in gnotobiotic rats associated with these organisms, inoculated alone or in combination. Oligomer breakdown and short chain fatty acid and gas production indicated hydrolysis and fermentation of the substrate. In vitro and in vivo, Cl. butyricum was the least efficient in utilizing GOS, whereas Bact. thetaiotaomicron was the most efficient. Kinetic studies on GOS hydrolysis in pH‐regulated fermenters showed that α‐1,2 glucosidic bonds, which characterize the substrate, were more resistant than α‐1,6 linkages. Adaptation of gnotobiotic rats to a diet containing 2% (w/w) GOS significantly increased the hydrolysis of α 1,2 glucosidic bonds. Combination of bacteria in trixenic rats improved GOS degradation and inhibited Cl. butyricum metabolism. This inhibition was confirmed in pH‐regulated fermenters containing GOS as the principal carbon source. The association of beneficial bacteria and GOS may therefore have a potential health‐promoting effect in human necnates. Copyright © 1995, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Djouzi, Z., Andrieux, C., Pelenc, V., Somarriba, S., Popot, F., Paul, F., … Szylit, O. (1995). Degradation and fermentation of α‐gluco‐oligosaccharides by bacterial strains from human colon: in vitro and in vivo studies in gnotobiotic rats. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 79(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb00924.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free