Step coverage comparison of Ti/TiN deposited by collimated and uncollimated physical vapor deposition techniques

  • Wang S
  • Schlueter J
  • Gondran C
  • et al.
10Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The step coverage and grain structure of Ti/TiN films sputtered with and without a collimator in a contact/via hole structure were compared using transmission electron microscopy, microelectron diffraction, and Auger electron spectroscopy with field emission microanalysis capability on cross-section samples. The holes have widths ranging from 0.40 to 0.75 μm and aspect ratios from 2.3 to 1.4, respectively. It was found that collimated Ti/TiN films demonstrate reasonably uniform coverage along the sidewall and at the bottom of holes. Collimated Ti bottom coverage is sufficient to assure good contact resistance. In contrast, uncollimated Ti/TiN films demonstrate an overhang on the top sidewall of holes and show decreased coverage when approaching the bottom corner along the sidewall or along the bottom of holes. Film property differences at different regions of a hole using either collimated or uncollimated deposition techniques will also be discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, S.-Q., Schlueter, J., Gondran, C., & Boden, T. (1996). Step coverage comparison of Ti/TiN deposited by collimated and uncollimated physical vapor deposition techniques. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena, 14(3), 1846–1852. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.588565

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free