Cardiovascular safety and effectiveness of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 3-year, large-scale post-marketing surveillance in Japan

7Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin is indicated for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the long-term safety, effectiveness, and clinical relationship with cardiovascular events of vildagliptin have not been evaluated in Japan. Methods: The authors conducted post-marketing surveillance (PMS) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of vildagliptin in more than 3000 Japanese T2DM patients for up to 3 years. Main assessments included demographics, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Results: In this PMS, 3831 patients (775 sites) were registered in April 2010 − April 2012. The safety analysis population comprised 3769 patients; 2085 patients were aged ≥65 years, and 240, 411, and 114 had renal impairment, hepatic impairment, and heart failure, respectively. The median treatment duration was 2.7 years. The incidence of MACE was 6.04 cases/1000 person-years, mostly attributable to cerebrovascular events (4.27 cases/1000 person-years). The AE and ADR incidences were 26.0% and 5.3%, respectively. The incidence of hypoglycemia was 0.6%. No significant changes in body weight occurred and mean change in HbA1c from baseline at final assessment was −0.74 ± 1.41% (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In real-world clinical settings, vildagliptin was well tolerated, with similar profiles as previously reported.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishida, Y., Murayama, H., Shinfuku, Y., Taniguchi, T., Sasajima, T., & Oyama, N. (2020). Cardiovascular safety and effectiveness of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 3-year, large-scale post-marketing surveillance in Japan. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 19(5), 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2020.1740679

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free