Recommendations for Reporting Machine Learning Analyses in Clinical Research

204Citations
Citations of this article
229Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Use of machine learning (ML) in clinical research is growing steadily given the increasing availability of complex clinical data sets. ML presents important advantages in terms of predictive performance and identifying undiscovered subpopulations of patients with specific physiology and prognoses. Despite this popularity, many clinicians and researchers are not yet familiar with evaluating and interpreting ML analyses. Consequently, readers and peer-reviewers alike may either overestimate or underestimate the validity and credibility of an ML-based model. Conversely, ML experts without clinical experience may present details of the analysis that are too granular for a clinical readership to assess. Overwhelming evidence has shown poor reproducibility and reporting of ML models in clinical research suggesting the need for ML analyses to be presented in a clear, concise, and comprehensible manner to facilitate understanding and critical evaluation. We present a recommendation for transparent and structured reporting of ML analysis results specifically directed at clinical researchers. Furthermore, we provide a list of key reporting elements with examples that can be used as a template when preparing and submitting ML-based manuscripts for the same audience.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevens, L. M., Mortazavi, B. J., Deo, R. C., Curtis, L., & Kao, D. P. (2020). Recommendations for Reporting Machine Learning Analyses in Clinical Research. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 13(10), E006556. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006556

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free