PGmc. (Figure presented): A response to Barrack

4Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Barrack (1991) argues against the reconstruction of PGmc. syllable structure proposed in Murray and Vennemann (1983), namely, (Figure presented). According to Murray and Venne-mann, this reconstruction is compatible with characteristics of early Germanic verse as well as Gothic word divisions and provides a basis for a coherent interpretation of major phonological changes in early Germanic; namely Sievers's Law, West Germanic gemination, North Germanic resyllabica-tion, and glide strengthening in Gothic. Focusing on these same points, Barrack attempts to reinterpret them as providing evidence for (Figure presented). In this response, I demonstrate that Barrack fails on all counts. Most importantly, he fails to provide a coherent, well-motivated interpretation of the pertinent phonological changes on the basis of his assumed (Figure presented). © 1993, Society for Germanic Linguistics. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murray, R. W. (1993). PGmc. (Figure presented): A response to Barrack. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures, 5(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1040820700000998

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free