The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples

767Citations
Citations of this article
4.0kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most research is conducted on convenience and purposive samples that may be randomly or nonrandomly drawn. A convenience sample is the one that is drawn from a source that is conveniently accessible to the researcher. A purposive sample is the one whose characteristics are defined for a purpose that is relevant to the study. The findings of a study based on convenience and purposive sampling can only be generalized to the (sub)population from which the sample is drawn and not to the entire population. This article explains the concepts involved with the help of examples of both good and bad sampling practice. Database studies and studies with enriched designs are cited as special examples of convenience and purposive sampling. Issues related to the internal and external validity of convenience and purposive samples are explained. The importance of good sampling techniques in the design and interpretation of research is understated; this must change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andrade, C. (2021). The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free