Lung function and clinical outcome in postpolio patients: A prospective cohort study during 11 years

26Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The object of this investigation was to prospectively study the annual decline in lung function in a cohort of postpolio patients, and to determine the usefulness of initial lung function tests in the prediction of a subsequent poor outcome. Cross-sectional data were analysed in 55 patients from the total cohort of 350 survivors of poliomyelitis in our admission area of 550,000 inhabitants. Longitudinal data (> 5 yrs, average 8.9 yrs) were available for 31 patients. Seventeen of the patients had a poor outcome (13 were started on domiciliary artificial ventilation and five died from respiratory failure; with one overlap). At the time of entry to the study (on average 4.3 years before the poor outcome), these patients had a lower vital capacity (VC) (43 vs 65% of predicted; p < 0.01) and arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2) (9.9 vs 11 kPa; p < 0.05) and a higher arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2) (6.0 vs 5.0 kPa; p < 0.01). They also had a more rapid increase in Pa,CO2 (0.3 vs 0.03 kPa · yr-1; p < 0.01), but the difference in decline in VC (40 vs 30 mL · yr-1) was not significant. Initial VC < 50% of predicted and/or Pa,CO2 > 6 kPa was associated with a poor prognosis. In conclusion, annual decline in vital capacity was not abnormally rapid but annual increase in arterial carbon dioxide tension was higher in patients with a poor outcome. Initial determination of vital capacity and initial and repeated blood gas analysis appear to be useful in identifying high-risk postpolio patients.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Midgren, B. (1997). Lung function and clinical outcome in postpolio patients: A prospective cohort study during 11 years. European Respiratory Journal, 10(1), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.97.10010146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free