Invited commentary: Composite outcomes as an attempt to escape from selection bias and related paradoxes

33Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This commentary reviews the recent history of explanations to crossover paradoxes such as the birth weight and gestational age paradoxes, with a special emphasis on the current proposal by Kramer et al. in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(3):361-367). We contend that the causal structure of these paradoxes is essentially identical to that of several well-known selection biases. We then consider the pros and cons of using composite outcomes to circumvent these selection biases. © 2013 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernán, M. A., Schisterman, E. F., & Hernández-Díaz, S. (2014, February). Invited commentary: Composite outcomes as an attempt to escape from selection bias and related paradoxes. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt283

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free