The articulation of /r/ in New Zealand English

18Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper investigates the articulation of approximant /r/ in New Zealand English (NZE), and tests whether the patterns documented for rhotic varieties of English hold in a non-rhotic dialect. Midsagittal ultrasound data for 62 speakers producing 13 tokens of /r/ in various phonetic environments were categorized according to the taxonomy by Delattre & Freeman (1968), and semi-automatically traced and quantified using the AAA software (Articulate Instruments Ltd. 2012) and a Modified Curvature Index (MCI; Dawson, Tiede & Whalen 2016). Twenty-five NZE speakers produced tip-down /r/ exclusively, 12 tip-up /r/ exclusively, and 25 produced both, partially depending on context. Those speakers who produced both variants used the most tip-down /r/ in front vowel contexts, the most tip-up /r/ in back vowel contexts, and varying rates in low central vowel contexts. The NZE speakers produced tip-up /r/ most often in word-initial position, followed by intervocalic, then coronal, and least often in velar contexts. The results indicate that the allophonic variation patterns of /r/ in NZE are similar to those of American English (Mielke, Baker & Archangeli 2010, 2016). We show that MCI values can be used to facilitate /r/ gesture classification; linear mixed-effects models fit on the MCI values of manually categorized tongue contours show significant differences between all but two of Delattre & Freeman's (1968) tongue types. Overall, the results support theories of modular speech motor control with articulation strategies evolving from local rather than global optimization processes, and a mechanical model of rhotic variation (see Stavness et al. 2012).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heyne, M., Wang, X., Derrick, D., Dorreen, K., & Watson, K. (2020). The articulation of /r/ in New Zealand English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 50(3), 366–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100318000324

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free