Pharmacokinetic analysis and tissue distribution of andrographolide in rat by a validated LC-MS/MS method

65Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Context: Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees (Acanthaceae) is widely used in tribal medicine in India and some other countries for multiple clinical applications. It contains andrographolide (AG) (diterpenoid lactone), a major phytomarker which probably accounts for its medicinal properties. Objective: This study investigates the site-specific distribution of AG in different tissues of rats and its pharmacokinetic parameter evaluation by using a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Materials and methods: A simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method has been developed and validated to quantify the presence of AG in plasma and various tissues of rat following oral administration of A. paniculata extract and AG in a dose of 133.33 and 100mg/kg/day, respectively, for four weeks. Results: The present study showed that the highest concentration of AG was in kidney (156.12ng/g) followed by liver, spleen and brain while almost same concentration was found in heart and lung. The apparent Cmax, Tmax, elimination half-life and total exposure (AUC0-α) were 115.81ng/ml, 0.75, 2.45 and 278.44ngh/ml, respectively. Conclusion: This was an attempt to determine the presence of AG (a known biomarker) in tissues such as kidney, heart, lungs, brain and plasma of rats using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Furthermore, the observed reduced concentration in plasma and various tissues from 1 to 8h might be attributed to relatively rapid elimination or distribution of AG from the central compartment. © 2014 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bera, R., Ahmed, S. K. M., Sarkar, L., Sen, T., & Karmakar, S. (2014). Pharmacokinetic analysis and tissue distribution of andrographolide in rat by a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmaceutical Biology, 52(3), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2013.836544

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free