Judicial Trials in the Context of Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

With the development of artificial intelligence technology, the convenience it brings is significant, but it is also limited. The functionality of judicial trials is "subjective"and "irreplaceable", while artificial intelligence as a new thing has the characteristics of "mechanization"and "programming"[1] Therefore, it is impossible and should not be possible to use artificial intelligence to build a trial stage artificial intelligence replacement. It cannot be reflected in the fact that the essential attributes of the two things deviate from each other, and their forced combination will only lead to the situation of doing their own things. It should not be embodied in the judicial trial agency as a dispute resolution agency. The public's demands are merely demands on "people", and the situation of replacing individuals only applies to situations where individuals are insufficient. Therefore, artificial intelligence should not replace judicial trials. The application of artificial intelligence in the judicial field should be limited to alternative jobs.