Deductive vs. inductive language learning

  • Gollin J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this issue, the ELT Journal introduces a new feature for its readership: a glossary, in encyclopedic form, of key concepts in the field of English language teaching. The aim of this feature is to assist readers to develop an appreciation of central ideas in ELT and to approach the content of articles from a perspective informed by current debate on aspects of theory and practice. Learner training During the 1970s, methodological trends in ELT moved towards a perspective of adult learners as capable of self-direction, able to plan and organize their own learning, and able to proceed in language learning with the kind of self-reliance they develop in other areas of their lives. Knowles (1975), for example, claimed that: there is convincing evidence that people who take the initiative in learning (pro-active learners) learn more things and learn better than do people who sit at the feet of teachers, passively waiting to be taught (reactive learners).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gollin, J. (1998). Deductive vs. inductive language learning. ELT Journal, 52(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.1.88

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free