The shift from adequacy to equity in federal education policymaking: A proposal for how ESEA could reshape the state role in education finance

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ESEA's original intent was to provide educational assistance to less privileged students. However, ESEA's supplemental funding for students and teachers has often been inadequate in addressing pervasive and systematic disparities in fiscal resources. These disparities exist between states, within states, and within school districts. In the spirit of the original legislation, this article proposes addressing educational fiscal inequities via a new program within ESEA that would reward states for reforming their education finance systems to address inequities between and within states, and within districts. The program would effectively steer federal resources to encourage thoughtful work to reform and recalibrate state- and district-level finance mechanisms. It would be designed as a competitive grant program built upon the framework of Race to the Top. This article articulates a rationale for the program, especially the need for a renewed federal focus on opportunity-to-learn, reviews relevant research, outlines program details, and reviews political considerations.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Houck, E. A., & Debray, E. (2015). The shift from adequacy to equity in federal education policymaking: A proposal for how ESEA could reshape the state role in education finance. RSF, 1(3), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2015.1.3.08

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free