Institutionalizing instability: The constitutional roots of insecurity in nigeria’s fourth republic

4Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Nigeria’s return to democracy has been a tumultuous era; the Fourth Republic has been characterized by insurgencies and violence throughout the country. Though seemingly disparate movements, the violence of the Fourth Republic has its roots in the country’s constitution. Three aspects of the 1999 Nigerian constitution stand out as particularly problematic: the centralization of the police at the federal level with limited sub-national oversight, the ambiguous concept of indigeneity, and the overlapping, often contradictory land tenure systems endorsed. All of these allude to the precariousness of Nigerian federalism under the current constitution; ultimately, the police centralization primes the country for violence, while the indigeneity rules and land tenure system make it more difficult to negotiate stable post-conflict settlements. The country’s recent experience with Boko Haram will be used to illustrate how these constitutional tenets facilitate instability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matfess, H. (2016). Institutionalizing instability: The constitutional roots of insecurity in nigeria’s fourth republic. Stability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.458

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free