Point of Care Tests VerifyNow P2Y12 and INNOVANCE PFA P2Y Compared to Light Transmittance Aggregometry After Fibrinolysis

9Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Detection of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) by point-of-care tests has not been validated after successful fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We assessed the validity of the point-of-care VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN) and INNOVANCE PFA P2Y (PFA) tests on HPR compared to light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) in these patients. The HPR was identified in 10 (34.5%) patients, 15 (51.7%) patients, and 14 (50%) patients using LTA, VN, and PFA, respectively. Discrepancies were observed between the tests despite significant correlations between platelet reactivity measures by LTA and VN (r = 0.74; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roule, V., Ardouin, P., Repessé, Y., Le Querrec, A., Blanchart, K., Lemaitre, A., … Beygui, F. (2018). Point of Care Tests VerifyNow P2Y12 and INNOVANCE PFA P2Y Compared to Light Transmittance Aggregometry After Fibrinolysis. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 24(7), 1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029618772354

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free