Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour

  • Roux T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Capstone programs are increasing recognised as high-impact value-laden learning experiences for students, especially in aiding the transition of final year students to professional practice. Although these learning programs have a long history in many disciplines, they are a very recent inclusion in law curriculum in Australia. This paper reports on a project designed to renew the final year law curriculum in Australia by developing a principled approach to designing capstone programs. This framework is based on six key principles, which are transition, integration and closure, diversity, engagement, assessment, and evaluation. The project also identified two themes underpinning capstone experiences which sit behind the six principles - integration and closure, and transition. The principled approach advocated by the authors’ bridges the gap between curriculum theorising and practice. This paper discusses the theme of transition and how the resources provided in the project Toolkit assist unit coordinators to design effective final year capstone programs. The toolkit outlines the six principles, providing commentary on each, and also offers suggestions for subject models along with examples of actual capstone programs, all of which have been designed to facilitate smooth transitions for final year students as they move from undergraduate to emerging professional.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roux, T. (2014). Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour. Legal Education Review, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free