Biomechanical evaluation of three ventral fixation methods for canine atlantoaxial instability: A cadaveric study

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We evaluated comparatively the mechanical strength in three kinds of surgical fixation techniques for canine atlantoaxial joint. Atlantoaxial plate fixation (APF), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) fixation (PMF) and transarticular fixation (TAF) were applied to the atlas and axis harvested from healthy beagle dogs, and then, the specimens were tested. The PMF group had significantly higher resistance to flexion than the APF group (P=0.030) and the TAF group (P=0.004). There were no significant differences in resistance to torsion between the APF group and the PMF group, while the APF group had significantly higher resistance to torsion than the TAF group (P=0.037). Considering the possible drawbacks of using PMMA, the APF method is proposed as an alternative to the PMF method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takahashi, F., Hakozaki, T., Kanno, N., Harada, Y., Yamaguchi, S., & Hara, Y. (2016). Biomechanical evaluation of three ventral fixation methods for canine atlantoaxial instability: A cadaveric study. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 78(12), 1897–1902. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free