Diagnostic Tools in the Detection of Physical Child Abuse: A Systematic Review

4Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Child abuse is a critical social issue. The orthopedic surgeon’s role is essential in noticing signs and symptoms of physical abuse. For this reason, several authors have proposed scoring systems to identify abuse early on and reduce undiagnosed cases. The aim of this systematic review is to overview the screening tools in the literature. In 2021, three independent authors performed a systematic review of two electronic medical databases using the following inclusion criteria: physical child abuse, questionnaire, survey, score, screening tool and predictive tool. Patients who had experienced sexual abuse or emotional abuse were excluded. The risk of bias evaluation of the articles was performed according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale Cohort Studies. Any evidence-level study reporting clinical data and dealing with a physical child abuse diagnosis tool was considered. A total of 217 articles were found. After reading the full texts and checking the reference lists, n = 12 (71,035 patients) articles were selected. A total of seven screening tools were found. However, only some of the seven diagnostic tools included demonstrated a high rate of sensitivity and specificity. The main limits of the studies were the lack of heterogeneity of evidence and samples and the lack of common assessing tools. Despite the multiplicity of questionnaires aimed at detecting validated child abuse, there was not a single worldwide questionnaire for early diagnosis. A combination of more than one test might increase the validity of the investigation.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

45846Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses

13201Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF) among undergraduates and depressive patients

212Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Early Life Stress (ELS) Effects on Fetal and Adult Bone Development

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neglect

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The imperative for universal screening of domestic violence: Social determinants of health disparities during COVID-19 within New Jersey

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pavone, V., Vescio, A., Lucenti, L., Amico, M., Caldaci, A., Pappalardo, X. G., … Testa, G. (2022, August 1). Diagnostic Tools in the Detection of Physical Child Abuse: A Systematic Review. Children. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081257

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

36%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

36%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Neuroscience 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free