Incorporating ChatGPT as an automated written corrective feedback tool into L2 writing class

  • Zhang Y
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This review focuses on the use of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) tools, particularly ChatGPT, in second language (L2) writing instruction. Writing is essential but challenging for L2 learners, and feedback plays a crucial role in enhancing writing skills. However, traditional teacher-provided written corrective feedback (WCF) faces challenges such as time constraints, cognitive overload, and inconsistency, especially in large classes. AWCF tools like Grammarly, Criterion, and ChatGPT help overcome these limitations by providing immediate and comprehensive feedback. The review begins by discussing the role of WCF in L2 writing, while highlighting the challenges associated with traditional feedback provision methods. It then explores the benefits and limitations of AWCF tools based on existing studies, noting their ability to offer instant feedback, reduce teachers’ workload, and motivate learners. Focusing on ChatGPT, the review highlights its ability to generate contextually appropriate and personalized feedback. ChatGPT offers several advantages, including promoting learner autonomy, enhancing feedback literacy, and improving writing quality by providing immediate corrections and suggestions. Learners have also shown positive perceptions of ChatGPT’s feedback in addressing grammatical errors and improving writing complexity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Y. (2024). Incorporating ChatGPT as an automated written corrective feedback tool into L2 writing class. Journal of Language Teaching, 4(4), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2024.024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free