Transfinite Iris: Resolving an existential dilemma of step-indexed separation logic

37Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Step-indexed separation logic has proven to be a powerful tool for modular reasoning about higher-order stateful programs. However, it has only been used to reason about safety properties, never liveness properties. In this paper, we observe that the inability of step-indexed separation logic to support liveness properties stems fundamentally from its failure to validate the existential property, connecting the meaning of existential quantification inside and outside the logic. We show how to validate the existential property-and thus enable liveness reasoning-by moving from finite step-indices (natural numbers) to transfinite step-indices (ordinals). Concretely, we transform the Coq-based step-indexed logic Iris to Transfinite Iris, and demonstrate its effectiveness in proving termination and termination-preserving refinement for higher-order stateful programs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spies, S., Gäher, L., Gratzer, D., Tassarotti, J., Krebbers, R., Dreyer, D., & Birkedal, L. (2021). Transfinite Iris: Resolving an existential dilemma of step-indexed separation logic. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) (pp. 80–95). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453483.3454031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free