ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with and without brain metastases: systematic review and network meta-analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors in ALK-rearranged positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases, and update the overall survival (OS) outcomes of the second-generation and third-generation ALK (ALK-2 nd G/3 rd G) inhibitors versus first-generation (ALK-1 st G) inhibitors. Design The study is in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published up to 3 November 2021 were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. Setting RCTs from any country and healthcare setting. Participants Patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with or without brain metastases. Interventions and comparisons The interventions were ALK-2 nd G/3 rd G; the control arm was ALK-1 st G or crizotinib. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes included median progression-free survival and median OS. Secondary outcomes included systemic objective response rate, intracranial response rate and rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 12 RCTs involving 3156 patients were analysed. Compared with ALK-1 st G (crizotinib), ALK-2 nd G (alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinib and ensartinib) significantly improved the OS (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.90, p=0.004) and intracranial response of patients with any brain metastases, especially with measurable (diameter ≥10 mm) brain metastases. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that ALK-3 rd G (lorlatinib) had superior efficacy for patients with brain lesions, but performed a distinct side-effect profile. Moreover, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in ALK-positive NSCLC. Conclusion Treatment with ALK-2 nd G inhibitors significantly improved OS compared with crizotinib, and alectinib has less severe AEs than any other ALK inhibitors with moderate-high efficacy. The limited OS follow-up and inadequate sample sizes might contribute to having no statistically significant difference in OS of lorlatinib versus crizotinib. More high-quality and longer follow-up RCTs are warranted to prove our findings. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021292245.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, J., Zhao, C., Zhang, F., Liu, Z., Zhou, K., Ren, X., & Wan, Y. (2022). ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with and without brain metastases: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060782

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free