Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel

466Citations
Citations of this article
773Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This paper explores Intel's strategy with respect to complements. We find that, as the literature predicts, Intel's entry decisions are shaped by the belief that it does not have the capabilities to enter all possible markets, and thus that it must encourage widespread entry despite the fact that potential entrants (rationally) fear Intel's ability to "squeeze" them ex post. We explore the ways in which Intel addresses this issue, highlighting in particular the firm's use of organizational structure and processes as commitment mechanisms. Our results have implications for our understanding of the dynamics of competition in complements and of the role of organizational form in shaping competition. © 2007 Blackwell Publishing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free