National incorporation of global human rights: Worldwide expansion of national human rights institutions, 1966-2004

135Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Using an event history framework we analyze the adoption rate of national human rights institutions. Neo-realist perspective predicts adoption rates to be positively in!uenced by favorable national profiles that lower the costs and make it more reasonable to establish these institutions. From a world polity perspective adoption rates will be positively in!uenced by a world saturated with human rights organizations and conferences, by increasing adoption densities, and by greater linkages to the world polity. We find support for both perspectives in the analysis of the human rights commission.#Only the changing state of the world polity is consequential for the founding of the classical ombudsman office. We discuss the national incorporation of international human rights standards and its relevance to issues of state sovereignty and national citizenship. © The University of North Carolina Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koo, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2009). National incorporation of global human rights: Worldwide expansion of national human rights institutions, 1966-2004. Social Forces, 87(3), 1321–1353. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0167

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free