ERRORLESS LEARNING: REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCIES AND STIMULUS CONTROL TRANSFER IN DELAYED PROMPTING

  • Touchette P
  • Howard J
125Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Delayed prompting can produce errorless discrimination learning. There is inherent in the procedure a disparity in reinforcement density which favors unprompted over prompted responses. We used three schedules of reinforcement to investigate the impact of reinforcement probability on transfer of stimulus control. One schedule of reinforcement was equal prior to and following a prompt (CRF/CRF), the second favored unprompted responses (CRF/FR3), and the third favored responses following the prompt (FR3/CRF). Experimental questions concerned the probability of errors, the probability of transfer, and the rate of transfer in the context of delayed prompting. Transfer was accelerated when reinforcement probability favored anticipatory responding. The schedule that favored prompted responses did not prevent a shift to unprompted responding. Errors were infrequent across procedures. Reinforcement probability contributes to but does not entirely determine transfer of stimulus control from a delayed prompt.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Touchette, P. E., & Howard, J. S. (1984). ERRORLESS LEARNING: REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCIES AND STIMULUS CONTROL TRANSFER IN DELAYED PROMPTING. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1984.17-175

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free