Accuracy of quantitative vessel analysis in endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions

Abstract

Background: Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of quantitative vessel analysis (QVA) in measuring the reference vessel diameter (RVD) of femoropopliteal lesions. Methods: Between October 2014 and September 2015, 30 consecutive femoropopliteal lesions in 25 patients who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance were analyzed. RVDs measured using QVAsheath (calibrated using a 6-Fr sheath in the common femoral artery) and QVAruler (calibrated using a ruler on the angiography table) were compared to those obtained using IVUS as the reference values. Results: The mean QVAsheath-measured RVD was significantly larger than the mean IVUS-measured RVD (5.34±1.29 vs. 5.07±1.20 mm, P=0.001). In contrast, mean QVAruler-measured RVD was 4.60±1.04 mm, which was significantly smaller than both the mean IVUS- and mean QVAsheath-measured RVD (both P<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the 95% limits of agreement versus IVUS ranged from -0.94 to 1.49 mm for QVAsheath and -1.69 to 0.76 mm for QVAruler, respectively. Agreement with tolerance of ±1.00 mm accounted for 88% of QVAsheath and 83% of QVAruler (P=0.60). The difference between QVA- and IVUS-measured RVDs was inversely correlated with the distance from the table (P=0.029 for QVAsheath and P=0.003 for QVAruler). Conclusions: The accuracy of both QVAsheath and QVAruler in measuring RVD were similarly suboptimal. Over- and under-estimation of RVD is not rare in QVA.