Full endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (Feid) for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, clinical outcome, and prognostic factors

16Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness and prognostic factors of revisional full endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (FEID) for recurrent herniation after conventional open disc surgery. The major concerns of the repeated discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) are the epidural scar and postoperative segmental instability. Compared to open discectomy, endoscopic method has advantages of less tissue traumatization, clearer visualization and better tissue identification. With the improvement of endoscopic technique and instrument, the problems related to adhesive scar tissues or postoperative instability could be overcome. Methods: From June 2014 to December 2016, FEID was performed in consecutive 24 patients for RLDH. The age ranged from 25 to 60 years (mean 44.6 years). The level operated was L5–S1 in 16 cases and L4–5 in 8 cases. To avoid injury to the neural tissue, we started with the bony structure. A small part of facet or lamina might be resected in severe stenotic or adhesive condition. Aggressive separation of the scar from the neural tissue might lead to dural tear and should be avoided. The herniated disc material was removed after neural tissue had been clearly identified and protected. Results: The follow-up period was at least 24 months. The visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain and back pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) showed significant improvement after treatment. Excellent or good outcome by the modified Macnab’s criteria was obtained in 22 of 24 patients at two years follow-up. Excellent outcome was noted in 100 percent patients younger than 50 years. Small durotomy occurred in 2 patients and no visible cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage was detected despite repair was not performed. Two additional surgery was performed including one repeated FEID for re-recurrence of disc herniation and one fusion surgery for postoperative back pain. Conclusions: FEID is a safe and effective alternative for recurrent disc herniation. The successful rate was greater than 90 percent, especially in the younger patients with the advantages of early recovery and no need for fusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, K. C., Hsieh, M. H., Yang, C. C., Chang, W. L., & Huang, Y. H. (2020). Full endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (Feid) for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, clinical outcome, and prognostic factors. Journal of Spine Surgery, 6(2), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-19-370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free