Intensive Care Admissions of HIV Infected Patients: The Effect of HAART on Outcomes in an Inner-City Hospital

  • Hashmi H
  • Mishra R
  • Venkatram S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) improves survival and quality of life in HIV-infected patients. Intensive care unit (ICU) utilization in HAART era has shifted to admissions mainly due non-HIV related conditions. In the inner-city population, compliance with HAART is tempered by social, economic and cultural factors. The impact of HAART on ICU outcomes in the inner-city remains unclear, we compared HIV-infected patients on HAART with those not on HAART. Methods: Retrospective, observational study of HIV-infected patients admitted to ICU, from January to July 2012. Patients were divided into: HAART+therapy and HAARTtherapy. Demographics, comorbid conditions, indications for admission and laboratories were obtained. Primary outcomes were: mechanical ventilation (MV) and tracheostomy rates, ICU and hospital length of stay(LOS) and mortality. Secondary outcomes were discharge status, one-year mortality. Results: 293 HIV-infected patients were admitted to ICU during study period; 205(70%) HAART+ and 85(30%) HAART-. HAART+ therapy were older (55+/-9.2versus49.2+/-87;p=0.0001), had less alcohol abuse (18versus15;p=0.04), higher CD4 count (308+/-280 versus224+/-279;p=0.02) and undetectable viral loads (107versus16;p=0.0001). No other differences were found between the groups. Renal failure was more common as etiology for admission in HAARTtherapy (18versus15;p=0.04). Eighty-eight (30%) patients were found to have urine toxicology positive for opioids, cocaine or marijuana. There were no differences for use of MV (46versus23;p=0.6), tracheostomy rates (22versus 9;p=1.0), ICULOS(4.44+/-4.17versus 4.4+/-3.41;p=0.93),hospital LOS (11.04+/-10.5versus 10.3+/-7.0;p=0.55) and mortality(15versus12;p=0.11). Overall mortality for the cohort was 27/290(9.3%). Patients on HAART+therapy were more likely to be discharged home(100versus54;p=0.0278). One-year mortality was similar in both groups(37versus16;p=0.86). Subgroup analysis of patients with CD4 less than 200 revealed no differences for patient with or without HAART therapy. Conclusions: Mortality rates for HIV-infected patients admitted to ICU in HAART-era remains low. In our population, HAART therapy before admission had no effect in outcomes for patients admitted to ICU. We found a significant group of HIV-infected patients not on HAART in our population. Etiologies for ICU admission were mainly non-HIV specific. Clinical Implications: ICU triage for HIV-infected patients should follow general guidelines. We need to evaluate barrier for HAART treatment in our population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hashmi, H. R. T., Mishra, R., Venkatram, S., & Diaz-Fuentes, G. (2015). Intensive Care Admissions of HIV Infected Patients: The Effect of HAART on Outcomes in an Inner-City Hospital. Chest, 148(4), 221A. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.2270835

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free