18F-Fluciclovine versus PSMA PET Imaging in Primary Tumor Detection during Initial Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Purpose: Fluorine 18 (18F)-fluciclovine and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracers are commonly used for localizing biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, but their accuracy in primary tumor detection in the initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer has not been established. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed of the electronic databases for original studies published between 2012 and 2020. Included studies were those in which 18F-fluciclovine or PSMA PET was used for initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The diagnostic performance data were collected for primary tumor with histopathologic results as reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used for quality appraisal. A random-effects model was used to summarize the effect sizes and to evaluate the difference between two groups. Results: Overall, 28 studies met the eligibility criteria, and 17 were included in the meta-analysis (18F-fluciclovine=4, PSMA=13). Of these 17 studies, 12 (70%) were judged to have high risk of bias in one of the evaluated domains, and nine studies were deemed to have applicability concerns. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for 18F-fluciclovine versus PSMA were 85% (95% CI: 73%, 92%) versus 84% (95% CI: 77%, 89%) (P=.78), 77% (95% CI: 60%, 88%) versus 83% (95% CI: 76%, 89%) (P=.40), and 18.88 (95% CI: 5.01, 71.20) versus 29.37 (95% CI: 13.35, 64.60) (P=.57), respectively, with no significant difference in diagnostic test accuracy. Conclusion:18F-fluciclovine and PSMA PET demonstrated no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy in primary tumor detection during initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer.