Initiating oral breathing in response to nasal loading: Asthmatics versus healthy subjects

21Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Factors influencing nasal versus oral breathing in asthmatics are not well understood. The current authors hypothesised that asthmatic subjects have enhanced perception of nasal threshold loads, and switch from nasal to oral breathing at a lower load than healthy subjects. In total, 15 mild asthmatic and 20 healthy control subjects breathed nasally via an inspiratory threshold loading device. Nasal loading was progressively increased until subjects switched to oral breathing. Load perception at switching was rated using a Borg scale. Nasal resistance was measured using posterior rhinomanometry. The protocol was repeated before and after nasal decongestant administration in subgroups of 10 healthy control and six asthmatic subjects. Inspiratory nasal resistance was within normal limits for most subjects and was not significantly different between asthmatics and healthy controls. Compared with controls, asthmatics switched to oral breathing at a significantly lower nasal load but rated "difficulty breathing in" at the same level. Decongestant significantly lowered nasal resistance but did not change the nasal load initiating switching in either subgroup. Enhanced perception of nasal loading may trigger increased oral breathing in asthmatics, potentially enhancing exposure to nonconditioned inhaled gas and contributing to the occurrence and/or severity of bronchoconstrictive exacerbations. Copyright©ERS Journals Ltd 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hallani, M., Wheatley, J. R., & Amis, T. C. (2008). Initiating oral breathing in response to nasal loading: Asthmatics versus healthy subjects. European Respiratory Journal, 31(4), 800–806. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00001007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free