Binomial nomenclature for virus species: a long view

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

On several occasions over the past century it has been proposed that Latinized (Linnaean) binomial names (LBs) should be used for the formal names of virus species, and the opinions expressed in the early debates are still valid. The use of LBs would be sensible for the current Taxonomy if confined to the names of the specific and generic taxa of viruses of which some basic biological properties are known (e.g. ecology, hosts and virions); there is no advantage in filling the literature with formal names for partly described viruses or virus-like gene sequences. The ICTV should support the time-honoured convention that LBs are only used with biological (phylogenetic) classifications. Recent changes have left the ICTV Taxonomy and its Code uncoordinated, and its aims and audience uncertain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibbs, A. (2020). Binomial nomenclature for virus species: a long view. Archives of Virology, 165(12), 3079–3083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04828-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free