Why is "Problems" Predictive of Positive Sentiment? A Case Study of Explaining Unintuitive Features in Sentiment Classification

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) algorithms aim to help users understand how a machine learning model makes predictions. To this end, many approaches explain which input features are most predictive of a target label. However, such explanations can still be puzzling to users (e.g., in product reviews, the word "problems"is predictive of positive sentiment). If left unexplained, puzzling explanations can have negative impacts. Explaining unintuitive associations between an input feature and a target label is an underexplored area in XAI research. We take an initial effort in this direction using unintuitive associations learned by sentiment classifiers as a case study. We propose approaches for (1) automatically detecting associations that can appear unintuitive to users and (2) generating explanations to help users understand why an unintuitive feature is predictive. Results from a crowdsourced study (N = 300) found that our proposed approaches can effectively detect and explain predictive but unintuitive features in sentiment classification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qu, J., Arguello, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). Why is “Problems” Predictive of Positive Sentiment? A Case Study of Explaining Unintuitive Features in Sentiment Classification. In 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2024 (pp. 161–172). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658547

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free