STUDY OF THE HEAT TRANSFER PERFORMANCE OF A LOOP HEAT PIPE WITH ALUMINUM WICK

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study used aluminum powder as a raw material to fabricate a wick for loop heat pipes by the powder metallurgy method and took advantage of the excellent corrosion resistance, low density and low cost of aluminum. The average pore diameter, porosity and permeability of the aluminum wicks were 9 pm, 47.65%, and 2.1 · 10-13 m-2, respectively. Then, to verify the feasibility of the aluminum wick, it was installed into a loop heat pipe to test the heat transfer performance. The experimental results showed that the loop heat pipe could transport a heating load of 130 W with a thermal resistance of 0.04 K/W under horizontal condition. A steady-state loop heat pipe mathematical model was developed, and the numerical results were compared with the experimental data. The results show that the model data are consistent with the experimental data, which means that Al wicks are suitable for use in the case of a high heating load and light weight.

References Powered by Scopus

Fabrication, properties, and applications of open-cell aluminum foams: A review

167Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thermal analysis of loop heat pipe used for high-power LED

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mathematical modeling of steady-state operation of a loop heat pipe

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

High-performance multi-morphology porous wick fabricated using a composite pore former

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Establishment and analysis of a new steady-state operation model of loop heat pipe

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, B., Xie, R., & Tao, L. (2022). STUDY OF THE HEAT TRANSFER PERFORMANCE OF A LOOP HEAT PIPE WITH ALUMINUM WICK. Thermal Science, 26(2), 1379–1390. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200904248L

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

33%

Chemical Engineering 1

33%

Engineering 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free