Unanswered ethical and scientific questions for trials of invasive interventions for coronary disease: The case of single vessel disease

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Trials in the 1990s demonstrated that medical therapy is as effective as invasive therapies for treating single-vessel coronary disease. Yet more recent studies enrolling patients with this condition have focused on evaluating only invasive approaches, namely, stenting versus coronary artery bypass surgery. Several ethical and scientific questions remain unanswered regarding the conduct of these later trials. Were they justified? Why wasn't a medical therapy arm included? Were subjects informed about the availability of medical therapy as an equivalent option? Was optimized medical therapy given prior to randomization? The absence of clear answers to these questions raises the possibility of serious bias in favor of invasive interventions. Considering that medical therapy is underutilized in patients with coronary disease, efforts should focus more on increasing utilization of medical therapy and proper selection of noninvasive interventions. © 2004 Jabbour et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jabbour, S., Ravid, S., & Lown, B. (2004, March 29). Unanswered ethical and scientific questions for trials of invasive interventions for coronary disease: The case of single vessel disease. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-5-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free