Urdu translation and validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) in women with urinary incontinence

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To provide an Urdu translation of the six-item version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and its validation in patients with urinary incontinence (UI), as the UDI-6 is a recognised, useful disease-specific questionnaire for the evaluation of UI in women. Patients and methods: We used a multi-step linguistic translation of the UDI-6, which comprised backward and forward translations coordinated by clinical investigators, followed by a pre-test in 10 patients. The final version was completed by a larger sample of women (n = 200), of which 100 had UI for the last 3 months and 100 had no UI. To appraise test–retest reliability the patients with UI were re-tested after 2 weeks. To test the questionnaire’s capacity to discriminate between women with or without UI, both cases (patients) and controls were included and assessed. The reliability of the UDI-6 was evaluated by internal consistency and was calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with P values, and test–retest reliability assessed by Spearman’s coefficient with P values. Results: The reliability of the UDI-6 was assessed for internal consistency and test–retest reliability was evaluated by Spearman’s coefficient, which showed significant P values. Conclusion: The present Urdu version of the UDI-6 is a linguistically valid instrument that can be reliably used in clinical practice and research. Abbreviations: IIQ-7: seven-item version of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire; IQR: interquartile ranges; QoL: quality of life; UDI-6: six-item version of the urogenital distress inventory; UI: urinary incontinence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faruqui, N., Chughtai, N., & Ahmed, J. (2019). Urdu translation and validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) in women with urinary incontinence. Arab Journal of Urology, 17(3), 212–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1618523

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free